Reading Research Literature, health and medicine homework help

When you have no idea what to do with your written assignments, use a reliable paper writing service. Now you don’t need to worry about the deadlines, grades, or absence of ideas. Place an order on our site to get original papers for a low price.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Skip To Content

Dashboard

  • Account

  • Dashboard

    Reading Research Literature Guidelines

    Updated 7/6/2017

    Purpose

    The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

    CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)

    CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)

    Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.

    Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

    Requirements

    1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

    Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

    Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http:/… (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

    Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http:/… (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

    2. Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

    3. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

    4. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.

    5. Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.

    6. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.

    7. Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

    Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

    NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

    Rubric

    NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

    NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 Purpose

    view longer description

    Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

    10.0 pts Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

    9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

    8.0 pts Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any purpose for the research.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research Question

    view longer description

    Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

    10.0 pts Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

    9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

    8.0 pts Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any research question.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research Design

    view longer description

    Correctly describes the research design of the study.

    10.0 pts Mostly describes the research design of the study.

    9.0 pts Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

    8.0 pts Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any research design.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 Population

    view longer description

    Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

    10.0 pts Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

    9.0 pts Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

    8.0 pts Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any population.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 Sample

    view longer description

    Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

    10.0 pts Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

    9.0 pts Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

    8.0 pts Misidentifies the sampling approach.

    4.0 pts Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data Collection

    view longer description

    Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

    9.0 pts Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

    8.0 pts Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

    4.0 pts Does not describe any data collection procedures.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data Analysis

    view longer description

    Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

    9.0 pts Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

    8.0 pts Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

    4.0 pts Does not describe how data were analyzed.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 Limitations

    view longer description

    Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

    9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

    8.0 pts Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

    4.0 pts Does not describe any limitations for the study.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 Conclusions

    view longer description

    Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

    9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

    8.0 pts Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

    4.0 pts Does not describe any author conclusions.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances Knowledge

    view longer description

    Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

    10.0 pts Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

    9.0 pts Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

    8.0 pts Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

    4.0 pts Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 Purpose

    view longer description

    Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

    10.0 pts Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

    9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

    8.0 pts Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any purpose for the research.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research Question

    view longer description

    Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

    10.0 pts Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

    9.0 pts Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

    8.0 pts Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any research question.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research Design

    view longer description

    Correctly describes the research design of the study.

    10.0 pts Mostly describes the research design of the study.

    9.0 pts Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

    8.0 pts Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any research design.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 Population

    view longer description

    Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

    10.0 pts Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

    9.0 pts Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

    8.0 pts Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

    4.0 pts Does not identify any population.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 Sample

    view longer description

    Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

    10.0 pts Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

    9.0 pts Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

    8.0 pts Misidentifies the sampling approach.

    4.0 pts Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data Collection

    view longer description

    Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

    9.0 pts Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

    8.0 pts Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

    4.0 pts Does not describe any data collection procedures.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data Analysis

    view longer description

    Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

    9.0 pts Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

    8.0 pts Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

    4.0 pts Does not describe how data were analyzed.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 Limitations

    view longer description

    Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

    9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

    8.0 pts Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

    4.0 pts Does not describe any limitations for the study.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 Conclusions

    view longer description

    Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

    10.0 pts Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

    9.0 pts Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

    8.0 pts Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

    4.0 pts Does not describe any author conclusions.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances Knowledge

    view longer description

    Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

    10.0 pts Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

    9.0 pts Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

    8.0 pts Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

    4.0 pts Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

    0.0 pts

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Writing

    view longer description

    Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

    25.0 pts One to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

    22.0 pts Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

    20.0 pts Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax

    10.0 pts Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

    0.0 pts

    25.0 pts

    Total Points: 225.0

    PreviousNext

    Top

    Writerbay.net

    Get help with your complex tasks from our writing experts. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

    Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


    Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper