Critique the following online article and use theoretical/empirical evidence to support your arguments: Genre may impact cognitive training using video games

When you have no idea what to do with your written assignments, use a reliable paper writing service. Now you don’t need to worry about the deadlines, grades, or absence of ideas. Place an order on our site to get original papers for a low price.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Critical review of an online article (80 marks) – 1000 words

Critique the following online article and use theoretical/empirical evidence to support your
arguments: Genre may impact cognitive training using video games
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/1710…

Relevant textbook chapters: Psychological Research, and Psychological Disorders

In your review (critical analysis) you should address the following areas/questions:

a) State the claims and key assumption(s): What key assumption(s) can be formulated based
on the claims made in the online article?

b) Viability of the claims: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the claims?

c) Modifications: Are there alternative explanations of the phenomenon?

References (5 marks)APA Format

Tips on how to approach this assignment

In writing your review, you should focus on issues around the key assumption(s) of the claims
made in the news article, the viability of the claims, and possible modifications to the claims.
Use theoretical and empirical evidence to support your arguments. Remember to reference any
sources you have cited in your review and apply the APA format.

a) Key assumption(s) of the claims: First of all, identify the claims made by the author of the
online news article. Then think critically about what the key assumption or assumptions are
based on these claims. For example, consider an article which claims that teenage boys are
better than teenage girls in Maths. This assumption is based on research studies conducted
in co-educational secondary schools in Singapore where boys were found to outperform
girls in Maths.


b) Viability of the claims: Critically think about the basis for the (key) assumption being
made. You can do this by identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the claims made by
the author of the online news article. How viable are the claims? Consider the assumption
that teenage boys are smarter because they are better in Maths than their female counterparts.
Are they really? Critically review this claim. The research study mentioned was conducted
in co-educational secondary schools in Singapore. Note that not all secondary schools in
Singapore are co-educational. Are there similar studies that were conducted in single-sex secondary schools in Singapore? Did girls from single-sex schools not perform as well in
Maths as their male counterparts in single-sex schools? Consider also that not all girls in coeducational
secondary schools come from co-educational primary schools. Could there be
other theoretical or empirical explanations for the inferior performance of girls in Maths
compared to their male counterparts in co-educational schools?

c) Modifications: If the claims made are not viable, you may want to consider alternative
theories and/or research to support your alternative view. This requires you to read widely
on the topic concerned so that sufficient knowledge can be gained to present a meaningful
discussion. You will also need to back up your argument with supporting theoretical or
empirical evidence based on your readings. For example, Attribution Theory and the
principles of Locus of Control may better explain the phenomenon described earlier where
teenage boys outperform teenage girls in Maths in co-educational secondary schools in
Singapore.

Attached my assignment

Writerbay.net

Get help with your complex tasks from our writing experts. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper